Briefly

BoG Warns Financial Institutions Against Unauthorised Foreign Currency Platforms

Legal NewsGhana·AllAfrica Ghana·Briefly Analysis

Abstract

The Bank of Ghana (BoG) has issued a mandatory directive instructing all regulated financial institutions to immediately cease supporting unauthorized foreign currency wallet services offered by cryptocurrency platforms to users in Ghana. This directive, issued on June 12, 2026, targets banks, specialised deposit-taking institutions, electronic money issuers, and payment service providers, prohibiting them from facilitating the funding, operation, or settlement of such services. The BoG asserts that these activities violate the Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987) and the Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723), as the crypto platforms involved lack the requisite authorisation. Non-compliant institutions face immediate supervisory and enforcement actions, underscoring the central bank's commitment to maintaining financial stability and regulatory oversight in Ghana's evolving digital asset landscape.

Introduction

The Bank of Ghana (BoG) recently issued a significant directive, dated June 12, 2026, compelling all regulated financial institutions within its jurisdiction to immediately discontinue any arrangements that facilitate unauthorised foreign currency wallet services provided by cryptocurrency platforms to users in Ghana. This decisive action underscores the central bank's ongoing efforts to assert regulatory control over the rapidly evolving digital asset ecosystem and to safeguard the integrity of the national financial system.

The directive specifically targets financial mechanisms that enable the funding, operation, and settlement of foreign currency-denominated digital wallets, primarily those in U.S. dollars, which are offered by crypto platforms without the necessary regulatory approvals. The BoG has expressed deep concern that these platforms leverage local banking infrastructure, including direct bank transfers and payment cards, to operate services that fall under the purview of existing Ghanaian financial legislation. This article will delve into the legal basis for the BoG's directive, its implications for regulated financial institutions, and the broader regulatory landscape for virtual assets in Ghana.

The central bank's move is a critical development for legal practitioners advising financial institutions, fintech companies, and virtual asset service providers in Ghana. It signals a tightening of regulatory oversight and a clear stance against unregulated foreign exchange activities, reinforcing the principle that all financial operations must adhere to established legal frameworks to ensure consumer protection and financial stability.

Background

Ghana's financial sector is primarily regulated by the Bank of Ghana, which derives its authority from several key legislative instruments. Central to the BoG's recent directive are the Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723), and the Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987). The Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723) governs all foreign exchange transactions in Ghana, stipulating that only licensed entities, such as universal banks and authorised foreign exchange bureaus, are permitted to engage in the business of buying and selling foreign currency. It also prohibits pricing, advertising, or making payments for goods and services in foreign currency without explicit authorisation from the BoG, reinforcing the Ghana Cedi as the sole legal tender.

The Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987) provides the regulatory framework for payment systems, electronic money issuance, and payment service providers in Ghana. This Act mandates that any entity offering payment services or issuing electronic money must be licensed and supervised by the Bank of Ghana. Furthermore, the Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016 (Act 930) grants the BoG overall supervisory and regulatory authority over deposit-taking businesses, including banks and specialised deposit-taking institutions, ensuring the soundness and stability of the financial system. These legislative pillars collectively empower the BoG to regulate financial activities and maintain oversight over the flow of currency within the economy.

While the Bank of Ghana has been exploring the potential of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), it has maintained a cautious stance towards private cryptocurrencies and virtual assets, prioritising consumer protection and financial stability. The BoG, in collaboration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), is actively developing a comprehensive regulatory framework for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), including the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 (Act 1154), to register and license such entities. This ongoing development highlights the central bank's recognition of digital assets while simultaneously reinforcing that unauthorised operations will not be tolerated.

Analysis

The Bank of Ghana's directive is a direct application of its mandate under the aforementioned Acts. The central bank explicitly states that the foreign currency wallet services offered by crypto platforms involve activities that require formal authorisation under the Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987) and the Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723). Since the crypto platforms in question have not obtained such authorisations, any financial institution facilitating their operations is deemed to be supporting illegal activities.

The directive's scope is broad, encompassing banks, specialised deposit-taking institutions, electronic money issuers, and payment service providers. These regulated entities are now strictly prohibited from establishing or maintaining any arrangements that facilitate the funding, operation, settlement, or customer access to these unauthorised fiat currency wallet services. This includes discontinuing support through direct bank transfers, payment cards, and other traditional payment channels. The immediate effective date of the directive, with no grace period, underscores the urgency with which the BoG views this issue and the potential risks it poses to the financial system.

This action by the BoG highlights a critical regulatory gap that often arises with emerging financial technologies like cryptocurrencies. While the BoG is actively working on a dedicated VASP regulatory framework, the current directive uses existing legislation to address immediate concerns regarding foreign exchange control and payment system integrity. The central bank's consistent warnings against dealing in cryptocurrencies and its emphasis on the Ghana Cedi as the sole legal tender further contextualise this directive as part of a broader strategy to manage financial innovation within a controlled environment.

The BoG's approach is consistent with its established regulatory sandbox, launched in 2023, which aims to foster fintech innovation in a controlled environment while ensuring consumer protection and financial stability. The sandbox allows eligible entities, including unlicensed fintech start-ups, to test innovative products and services under regulatory supervision. However, the current directive makes it clear that operating outside such authorised frameworks, particularly in sensitive areas like foreign currency exchange, will not be tolerated. Institutions that fail to comply with the directive risk facing immediate supervisory or enforcement actions, which could include sanctions and regulatory penalties.

Conclusion

The Bank of Ghana's directive on unauthorised foreign currency platforms represents a significant reinforcement of its regulatory authority over financial transactions in Ghana. For practising attorneys, it is imperative to advise regulated financial institutions on the immediate and strict compliance requirements. Institutions must promptly review and terminate any existing arrangements that support crypto platforms offering foreign currency wallet services without explicit BoG authorisation. Failure to do so will expose them to severe supervisory and enforcement actions.

Looking ahead, practitioners should closely monitor the development and eventual implementation of the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 (Act 1154) and its supporting regulations. This framework will provide clearer guidelines for legitimate participation in the virtual asset space. In the interim, the BoG's directive serves as a stark reminder that innovation in the financial sector must proceed within the confines of established legal and regulatory frameworks, with the central bank maintaining a firm grip on foreign exchange control and payment system integrity to protect the Ghanaian financial ecosystem.

Citations

  1. 1.Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723)
  2. 2.Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987)
  3. 3.Banks and Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016 (Act 930)
  4. 4.Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2020 (Act 1044)
  5. 5.Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 (Act 1154)