Bulldozer demolitions continue with impunity to satiate bloodlust of society: Justice Atul Sreedharan

The Allahabad High Court has expressed concern over the continued demolition of houses by state governments despite Supreme Court directions to refrain from such punitive action. Justice Atul Sreedharan observed that these demolitions are 'largely to satiate the perceived blood lust' of society, which is fed by media reports and social media. The judge noted that these actions continue with impunity, as if the court's judgments do not exist or the state believes it will face no consequences for defying the law.

The Allahabad High Court has recently dealt with a petition alleging punitive action against properties of a family after one of their relatives was booked under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). In his ruling, Justice Atul Sreedharan expressed concern over the continued demolition of houses by state governments despite Supreme Court directions to refrain from such actions. This development raises important questions about the enforcement of court judgments and the impact of media reports on public perception.

The issue of demolitions as a form of punitive action has been a contentious one in India. The Supreme Court has previously directed state governments to refrain from such actions, but it appears that these directions have not been effectively implemented. Justice Sreedharan's ruling highlights the need for greater accountability and adherence to court judgments in this regard. The use of media reports and social media to justify demolitions is also a concerning trend, as it can perpetuate a culture of vigilantism and undermine the rule of law.

The implications of this development are far-reaching and have significant implications for human rights and the administration of justice. The continued demolition of houses despite Supreme Court directions raises questions about the effectiveness of the judiciary in enforcing its judgments. It also highlights the need for greater accountability and transparency in the implementation of court orders.

As Justice Sreedharan's ruling suggests, the continued demolition of houses despite Supreme Court directions is a concerning trend that requires immediate attention. Practitioners must continue to monitor this issue and advocate for greater accountability and adherence to court judgments in this regard.