Educational qualification, public stature no defence for derogatory remarks against women: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has ruled that individuals with public stature and educational qualifications cannot use their status as a defence against derogatory remarks made against women. The court's decision was made in response to two First Information Reports (FIRs) registered against scientist Dr. Ponraj for allegedly making demeaning comments about women members of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The court held that persons with public standing must exercise greater restraint when making public statements and are expected to refrain from making derogatory remarks against women.

The Madras High Court recently refused to quash two FIRs registered against Dr. Ponraj, a scientist and political commentator, over alleged derogatory remarks made against women members of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The court's decision highlights the importance of holding public figures accountable for their words and actions.

The case concerned an interview telecast on the King 360 YouTube channel on March 18, in which Dr. Ponraj allegedly described women members of the TVK using derogatory terms. The FIRs invoked Section 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which penalises words, gestures or acts intended to insult the modesty of a woman. The court's decision is significant as it sets a precedent for holding public figures accountable for their actions.

The court's ruling has implications for public discourse and the responsibility of individuals with public stature. Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan noted that persons with scientific eminence, educational qualifications, and public accomplishments bear a greater responsibility in public discourse and are expected to refrain from making derogatory or demeaning remarks against women. This decision highlights the need for public figures to exercise greater restraint when making public statements.

The Madras High Court's decision serves as a reminder that individuals with public stature must be held accountable for their words and actions. Practitioners should note that this decision sets a precedent for holding public figures accountable for their actions, particularly in cases involving derogatory remarks against women.