Freitag v Commissioner of Correction Post-Opinion Filing Deadline Clarified

• The 'officially released' date in a Connecticut court opinion marks the start of time periods for filing post-opinion motions and petitions for certification.
• This date is now tied to the officially released opinion date, rather than the original release date, a rule that took effect on January 1, 2010.
• Lawyers must track this specific date accurately to plan and file post-opinion motions and petitions for certification effectively.

The operative date for these filings has been tied to the officially released opinion date.

In a development that took effect on January 1, 2010, the Connecticut Law Journal publication clarified its guidelines for officially releasing court opinions. The clarification comes in the form of a note that appears near the beginning of an opinion, indicating the date it will be published or released as a slip opinion. This 'officially released' date is crucial, as it marks the start of time periods for filing post-opinion motions and petitions for certification.

The operative date for these filings has been tied to the officially released opinion date. This means that lawyers and parties involved in cases must now keep track of this specific date, which may differ from the original release date of the opinion.

In Connecticut, court opinions are typically published or released as slip opinions, with a note indicating the officially released date. This date is significant because it triggers time periods for filing post-opinion motions and petitions for certification. The clarification by the Connecticut Law Journal emphasizes the importance of this 'officially released' date in determining the operative date for these filings, a practice codified in the Connecticut Practice Book effective January 1, 2010.

It's worth noting that opinions are subject to modification and technical correction, which can occur after their initial release. However, the officially released date remains a critical benchmark for lawyers and parties involved in cases.

The clarification regarding the 'officially released' date has important implications for lawyers and parties involved in cases. With the operative date now tied to the officially released opinion date, it's essential to track this specific date accurately. This may require adjustments in planning and filing strategies, particularly with regards to post-opinion motions and petitions for certification.

The change also underscores the need for careful attention to detail when dealing with court opinions and their publication dates. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, staying informed about such developments is crucial for navigating complex cases effectively.

Lawyers should note the operative date for post-opinion motions and petitions for certification, as it is now tied to the officially released opinion date.

Source: Original reporting via Connecticut Law Journal publication