LEARN MORE

The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa has significantly intensified its regulatory scrutiny and enforcement actions, as evidenced by its recent Regulatory Actions Report for 2024/2025 and its 2026 Three-Year Regulation Plan. This heightened focus, driven by the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (FSR Act) and the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002 (FAIS Act), signals a shift towards a more proactive, outcomes-based supervisory approach. Legal professionals and financial services providers (FSPs) must navigate a landscape characterised by increased administrative penalties, a strong emphasis on market conduct, and a broadening regulatory perimeter, particularly concerning unregistered entities, online financial harm, and the impending Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill.

The South African financial sector is currently experiencing a period of profound regulatory evolution, spearheaded by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA). Operating under the "Twin Peaks" regulatory model established by the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (FSR Act), the FSCA is the dedicated market conduct regulator, tasked with ensuring the fair treatment of financial customers and maintaining the integrity of financial markets. Recent pronouncements and reports from the FSCA underscore a significant intensification of its supervisory activities and enforcement posture, demanding a renewed focus on compliance from all financial services providers (FSPs) and the legal practitioners advising them.

The foundation of South Africa's financial sector regulation rests primarily on two pillars: the FSR Act and the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002 (FAIS Act). The FSR Act, which came into effect in 2018, introduced the Twin Peaks model, dividing regulatory responsibilities between the Prudential Authority (responsible for financial stability) and the FSCA (responsible for market conduct). This framework empowers the FSCA to issue regulatory instruments, conduct supervisory inspections, and impose administrative penalties for non-compliance with financial sector laws.

The FAIS Act, a cornerstone of market conduct regulation since its enactment in 2002, specifically governs the provision of financial advice and intermediary services. It mandates that FSPs be licensed, meet stringent "fit and proper" requirements, and adhere to detailed codes of conduct aimed at protecting consumers. The FSCA's role involves overseeing compliance with these provisions, investigating alleged breaches, and taking appropriate enforcement action to ensure that financial services are rendered professionally and responsibly.

The FSCA's Regulatory Actions Report for the period 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025 provides a clear indication of the Authority's heightened enforcement activities. During this period, the FSCA finalised 633 investigations, issued 107 public warnings, and imposed 51 administrative penalties totalling R119.8 million. A notable trend highlighted in the report is the significant increase in investigations related to unregistered financial and insurance services, which accounted for over 70% of new cases, with unregistered insurance cases surging by 134%. This underscores the FSCA's aggressive stance against unlawful financial activities and its commitment to protecting vulnerable consumers from illicit operators.

Furthermore, the FSCA has escalated its efforts against online financial harm, including fraudulent investment schemes, fake trading platforms, and the rise of social media "finfluencers" offering unauthorised financial advice. The Authority's focus extends to holding individuals accountable, as evidenced by the debarment of 131 individuals, largely for dishonest conduct, and the withdrawal of 382 licences, primarily due to the non-submission of statutory returns. The substantial increase in the quantum of administrative penalties reflects the FSCA's strategic approach to enhancing effective deterrence, particularly in response to South Africa's greylisting by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which has led to strengthened oversight of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations.

Looking ahead, the FSCA's 2026 Three-Year Regulation Plan (1 April 2026 – 31 March 2029) outlines a strategic roadmap that will further reshape the regulatory landscape. A key priority is the advancement of the Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill transition, which is expected to fundamentally modernise the legal framework by moving towards a harmonised, outcomes- and principles-based approach. The plan also introduces new compliance workstreams, including algorithmic governance, life-sector concentration risk, retirement-fund fee scrutiny, and continued AML/CFT capacity building. The FSCA is also widening its jurisdiction to bring payment services, credit-related services, foreign exchange services, and medical schemes under its conduct framework via the FSR Act, signalling a broader regulatory perimeter. This forward-looking strategy emphasises a shift from merely examining paperwork to focusing on evidence of day-to-day operational conduct and outcomes.

The FSCA's intensified regulatory scrutiny and the strategic direction outlined in its 2026 Regulation Plan necessitate a proactive and comprehensive approach to compliance for all FSPs. Legal practitioners must advise their clients to move beyond mere technical compliance and embrace an outcomes-based culture that prioritises fair treatment of customers and robust internal controls. The increasing administrative penalties and the FSCA's willingness to take decisive action against misconduct, including debarments and licence withdrawals, underscore the severe consequences of non-compliance.

Practitioners should closely monitor the parliamentary process and subsequent implementation of the COFI Bill, as it will introduce significant changes to the regulatory framework. Furthermore, FSPs must review their compliance frameworks to address emerging risks such as online financial harm, algorithmic governance, and the expanded regulatory perimeter. Engaging actively in FSCA consultation processes and ensuring meticulous record-keeping of all advice, disclosures, training, and complaints will be crucial in demonstrating compliance and mitigating regulatory risk in this evolving landscape.