Nigerian Human Rights Community — NG Legal Update

Abstract
A coalition of human rights groups declared the June 18, 2022, Ekiti State gubernatorial election as credible, free, fair, and compliant with international standards. This assessment highlights the positive impact of the Electoral Act 2022, particularly the deployment of technological innovations like the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV), in enhancing the transparency and integrity of Nigeria's electoral process. The declaration underscores the evolving landscape of electoral jurisprudence in Nigeria, where observer missions play a crucial role in validating election outcomes and fostering public confidence, despite persistent challenges and the judiciary's ultimate role in dispute resolution.
Introduction
The June 18, 2022, gubernatorial election in Ekiti State marked a significant moment in Nigeria's democratic journey, drawing considerable attention from both local and international observers. Following the poll, a coalition of human rights organisations, operating under the umbrella of the Nigerian Human Rights Community, issued a commendation, declaring the election as credible, free, fair, and meeting global standards. This pronouncement carries substantial weight, not merely as a validation of a specific electoral exercise, but as an indicator of the potential for improved electoral integrity within Nigeria's evolving democratic framework. The positive assessment by these rights groups provides a crucial lens through which to examine the practical application and effectiveness of recent electoral reforms, particularly the Electoral Act 2022, and its implications for future elections and electoral litigation in the country.
Background
Nigeria's electoral landscape is primarily governed by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022. The Electoral Act 2022, signed into law on February 25, 2022, introduced significant reforms aimed at enhancing the transparency, credibility, and efficiency of elections. Key innovations include the legalisation of electronic voter accreditation through the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the electronic transmission of polling unit results via the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV). These technological advancements were designed to mitigate issues such as ballot snatching, voter register manipulation, and other forms of electoral fraud that had historically plagued Nigerian elections. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is constitutionally mandated to organise, undertake, and supervise all elections, and its regulations and guidelines, issued under Section 149 of the Electoral Act, form an integral part of the electoral legal framework. Election observation, both by domestic and international bodies, is a critical component of ensuring electoral integrity. Observers act as watchdogs, assessing the quality of elections against established national laws and international standards, thereby inspiring voter confidence and providing an independent assessment of the process. International benchmarks for democratic elections, such as those enshrined in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, provide a framework for evaluating the freeness and fairness of elections across the continent.
Analysis
The human rights groups' declaration regarding the Ekiti gubernatorial election in 2022 specifically highlighted the improvements in the electoral process, attributing the success to the deployment of BVAS and the electronic transmission of results. These innovations, legalised by the Electoral Act 2022, were praised for enhancing transparency, accountability, and credibility, effectively reducing instances of ballot snatching and voter register manipulation. The use of BVAS for voter accreditation and the IReV for real-time publishing of polling unit-level results were indeed significant steps towards modernising election machinery and fostering public trust. However, it is pertinent to note that despite these advancements, some challenges persisted, such as complaints about the siting of polling units in private residences and compounds, which could potentially compromise ballot secrecy and encourage vote trading.
From a legal practitioner's perspective, observer reports, while not legally binding, often serve as crucial corroborative evidence in election petitions. The Supreme Court of Nigeria has consistently played a pivotal role in shaping electoral jurisprudence, often emphasizing the standard of 'substantial compliance' with the Electoral Act. In the context of the Ekiti 2022 election, the outcome was indeed challenged by the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate, Chief Olusegun Oni, at the Ekiti State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal. Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the victory of Governor Biodun Oyebanji, dismissing the petition and describing the verdict as a victory for democracy. This judicial affirmation, coupled with positive observer reports, reinforces the perception of the election's legitimacy.
Comparing the Ekiti election to international standards, the emphasis on free and fair elections, transparency, and the right to participate in government, as articulated in instruments like Article 13 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, aligns with the positive assessment. The ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance also stresses the importance of credible elections and the role of monitoring teams. While Nigeria has made strides, as evidenced by the Ekiti election, the judiciary's stance on certain progressive provisions of the Electoral Act 2022, particularly concerning electronic transmission of results in some subsequent cases, has raised concerns about the full realisation of these reforms. This highlights a continuous tension between legislative intent, technological implementation, and judicial interpretation in Nigeria's electoral system.
Conclusion
The declaration by human rights groups that the June 2022 Ekiti gubernatorial election met global standards is a welcome development, reflecting the positive impact of the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC's efforts in deploying technology for improved transparency and credibility. For legal practitioners, this signifies an evolving electoral landscape where observer reports, while not determinative, can significantly influence public perception and provide valuable context in election petitions. The consistent use of BVAS and IReV, coupled with judicial affirmation of election outcomes, suggests a strengthening of the legal framework for electoral integrity. However, practitioners must remain vigilant regarding the judiciary's interpretation of electoral laws, especially concerning the weight given to technological evidence versus traditional forms of proof. Future elections will continue to test the resilience of these reforms, and ongoing advocacy for constitutional backing for independent candidacy, improved accessibility for vulnerable voters, and addressing issues like vote-buying will be crucial. The Ekiti experience serves as a benchmark, indicating that with sustained commitment to legal reforms and technological integration, Nigeria can progressively achieve more credible and globally compliant electoral processes.
Citations
- 1.Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)
- 2.Electoral Act 2022
- 3.African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (1981)
- 4.ECOWAS Protocol A/SP1/12/01 on Democracy and Good Governance (2001)
- 5.African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (2007)
- 6.Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections 2022
- 7.Punch Nigeria. (2026, June 29). Ekiti gov poll met global standards – Rights groups. Retrieved from https://punchng.com/ekiti-gov-poll-met-global-standards-rights-groups/
- 8.Grokipedia. (n.d.). 2022 Ekiti State gubernatorial election. Retrieved from https://grokipedia.org/wiki/2022_Ekiti_State_gubernatorial_election
- 9.Ekiti State Government. (n.d.). Gov. Oyebanji hails Supreme Court judgment re-affirming his election. Retrieved from https://ekitistate.gov.ng/gov-oyebanji-hails-supreme-court-judgment-re-affirming-his-election/
- 10.Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC). (n.d.). Key Provisions in the Electoral Act 2022. Retrieved from https://placng.org/electoral-act-2022-key-provisions/
- 11.Nigeria Open Data. (n.d.). Electoral Act 2022 — Key Provisions, Effects, Full Background. Retrieved from https://nigeriaopendata.org/dataset/electoral-act-2022
- 12.PM News Nigeria. (2022, June 3). Ekiti 2022: INEC releases guidelines for conduct of elections. Retrieved from https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2022/06/03/ekiti-2022-inec-releases-guidelines-for-conduct-of-elections/
- 13.Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC). (n.d.). Electoral Act 2022. Retrieved from https://placng.org/electoral-act-2022/
- 14.Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA). (2024, October 21). DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT AND UNDERDEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA. Retrieved from https://eisa.org/pdf/JAE_2024_v23i1a5.pdf
- 15.Ife Social Sciences Review. (n.d.). Appraisal of the Role of Electoral Observers/Monitoring Groups in the Conduct of Credible Elections in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.ifesocialsciencesreview.com/index.php/issr/article/view/10/10
- 16.NGE WEBSITE. (2025, November 12). Electoral Integrity And Trust Deficit: What Nigerians Expect In 2027. Retrieved from https://www.nigeriangovernance.org/electoral-integrity-and-trust-deficit-what-nigerians-expect-in-2027/
- 17.International IDEA. (2026, February 9). Democracy under pressure: Threats to Nigeria's 2027 elections. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/democracy-under-pressure-threats-nigerias-2027-elections
- 18.Situation Room. (2022, July 16). REPORT OF OBSERVATION OF THE EKITI STATE GOVERORSHIP ELECTION 2022. Retrieved from https://situationroom.org.ng/report-of-observation-of-the-ekiti-state-goverorship-election-2022/
- 19.INEC. (n.d.). Is Electronic Transmission of Election Results a Game Changer?. Retrieved from https://www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/ERAD-Report-on-Electronic-Transmission-of-Election-Results-in-the-2022-Ekiti-and-Osun-Governorship-Election.pdf
- 20.The Electoral Hub. (n.d.). FACTSHEET ON EKITI STATE 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION. Retrieved from https://electoralhub.iriad.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/FACTSHEET-ON-EKITI-STATE-2022-GOVERNORSHIP-ELECTION.pdf
- 21.RSIS International. (2023, June 20). An Overview of the Electoral Act, 2022. Retrieved from https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijhss/DOI/V12I06/1.pdf
- 22.INEC. (n.d.). TIMETABLE-AND-SCHEDULE-OF-ACTIVITIES-FOR-EKITI-STATE-GOVERNORSHIP-2022.pdf. Retrieved from https://www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/TIMETABLE-AND-SCHEDULE-OF-ACTIVITIES-FOR-EKITI-STATE-GOVERNORSHIP-2022.pdf
- 23.Election Observation and Democracy Support (EODS). (n.d.). Chapter 6 - Africa. Retrieved from https://www.eods.eu/library/eods-handbook-on-election-observation-and-democracy-support/chapter-6-africa/
- 24.The Fletcher School at Tufts University. (2026, January 21). Africa's Human Rights Institutions are Electing Leaders. Retrieved from https://sites.tufts.edu/fletcherforum/2026/01/21/africas-human-rights-institutions-are-electing-leaders/
- 25.ECOWAS/KAIPTC Election Observation Training Course. (2017, July 7). Retrieved from https://www.kaiptc.org/news/ecowas-kaiptc-election-observation-training-course/
- 26.ResearchGate. (2024, March 30). The role of election observers in democratic consolidation in Nigeria, A comparative study of the 2015 and 2019 election. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379440306_The_role_of_election_observers_in_democratic_consolidation_in_Nigeria_A_comparative_study_of_the_2015_and_2019_election
- 27.UNOWA. (n.d.). ON ELECTIONS AND STABILITY. Retrieved from https://unowa.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/praia_declaration_on_elections_and_stability_in_west_africa_en.pdf
- 28.ECDPM. (n.d.). Understanding ECOWAS efforts in promoting a governance agenda. Retrieved from https://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ECDPM-Discussion-Paper-147-Understanding-ECOWAS-efforts-promoting-governance-agenda.pdf
- 29.Pasas-minka. (2024, June 28). ECOWAS PROTOCOL ON DEMOCRACY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE TO THE 2021 GUINEAN COUP D’ÉTAT. Retrieved from https://pasas-minka.com/index.php/pasas/article/download/125/125/
- 30.INEC. (2026, April 20). guidelines for election. Retrieved from https://www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/REGULATIONS-AND-GUIDELINES-FOR-THE-CONDUCT-OF-ELECTIONS-2022.pdf
- 31.PLAC Legist. (2022, July 1). Supreme Court Judgment Declines Jurisdiction on Electoral Act Amendment. Retrieved from https://placng.org/supremecourtjudgmentdeclinesjurisdictiononelectoralactamendment/
- 32.News Central TV. (2024, January 23). Nigerian Supreme Court Affirms Governors' Victories in Election Disputes. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d_11-39l6M
- 33.Situation Room. (n.d.). Historical Context of Election Laws in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://situationroom.org.ng/historical-context-of-election-laws-in-nigeria/
- 34.African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR). (2026, March 13). Resolution on Elections in Africa in 2026 (ACHPR/Res.655(LXXXVI) 2026). Retrieved from https://www.achpr.org/public/Document/details?id=208
- 35.African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR). (2020, July 1). ACHPR: COMPOSITION & ELECTION PROCESS. Retrieved from https://www.achpr.org/public/Document/details?id=125
- 36.RSIS International. (2023, June 20). An Overview of the Electoral Act, 2022. Retrieved from https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijhss/DOI/V12I06/1.pdf
- 37.Electoral Integrity in Nigeria: Challenges, Strategies and Pathways to Reform. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379440306_The_role_of_election_observers_in_democratic_consolidation_in_Nigeria_A_comparative_study_of_the_2015_and_2019_election
How does this affect your business?
Get an AI analysis of this article grounded in your jurisdictions, practice areas, and any policy documents you've uploaded to Wansom.
