Supreme Court Agrees to Hear NEET Paper Leak Protest PIL

• A fresh PIL has been filed in the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two such petitions today, July 27, 2026, seeking a judicial probe into alleged police excesses during the NEET paper leak protest.
• The PIL demands the constitution of a Judicial Commission to investigate allegations of police misconduct and scrutinise internet restrictions imposed during protests.
• If granted, this could set a crucial precedent for future judicial probes into alleged police misconduct during public demonstrations in India.

The petitioners argue that the police must be held accountable for their actions during public demonstrations, and that a judicial probe is essential to ensure that justice is served.

A fresh Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two such petitions today, July 27, 2026, seeking a judicial probe into alleged police excesses during the recent NEET paper leak protest. The PIL, which is the second of its kind in the top court, seeks to examine the use of force by law enforcement agencies in Delhi and Bihar. According to the petitioners, the police resorted to excessive force, causing injuries to several protesters and damaging property.

The PIL also demands that a Judicial Commission be constituted to investigate the allegations of police misconduct and scrutinise the legality of internet restrictions imposed during the protests. The commission is expected to preserve electronic evidence related to the incidents and submit its report to the court within a specified timeframe.

This PIL comes on the heels of another similar petition filed in the Supreme Court earlier this year, which also sought a judicial probe into alleged police excesses during the NEET paper leak protest. The top court has been increasingly scrutinising the actions of law enforcement agencies during public demonstrations, with several recent judgments highlighting the need for accountability and transparency in such matters.

The PIL's demand for a judicial probe is likely to be seen as a significant development in the context of ongoing efforts to reform India's policing laws. The petitioners argue that the police must be held accountable for their actions during public demonstrations, and that a judicial probe is essential to ensure that justice is served.

The PIL has significant implications for lawyers and activists who have been pushing for greater accountability in policing. If the top court grants permission to constitute a Judicial Commission, it could set a crucial precedent for future judicial probes into alleged police misconduct during public demonstrations.

Moreover, the PIL's focus on preserving electronic evidence and scrutinising internet restrictions imposed during protests highlights the need for greater transparency in policing. The petitioners argue that such measures are essential to prevent human rights abuses and ensure that the rule of law is upheld.

Lawyers should watch for the potential precedent set by this PIL, which could influence future judicial probes into alleged police misconduct during public demonstrations in India.

Source: Original reporting via News Agency