Trump Birthright Citizenship Case Hits Roadblock After Deadline

• The Trump administration will not seek rehearing in the birthright citizenship case, despite earlier indications that it would.
• The Supreme Court's June 30 ruling struck down President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship.
• Federal courts have consistently ruled against the Trump administration on issues related to birthright citizenship and universal injunctions.
• The Supreme Court's decision on universal injunctions has significant implications for federal courts and their ability to issue nationwide orders.
• This development suggests that the Trump administration's efforts to limit birthright citizenship may be at an end.

The Trump administration's failure to seek rehearing in the birthright citizenship case suggests that its efforts to limit birthright citizenship may be at an end.

The Trump administration's plans to ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its June 30 ruling on birthright citizenship appear to have stalled. Despite President Donald Trump's earlier indication that he would file a petition for rehearing in the case, Trump v. Barbara, no such brief has been submitted by the July 27 deadline. The electronic docket for the case remains unchanged, with no sign of a rehearing request from the administration.

This development comes after the Supreme Court's June 30 ruling struck down President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship. The order, issued on January 20, 2025, was met with immediate legal challenges from states, immigrants' rights groups, and individuals. Federal judges around the country agreed that the order violated the Constitution.

The Supreme Court had previously weighed in on a related issue, ruling by a vote of 6-3 on June 27, 2025, that federal courts do not have the power to issue universal or nationwide injunctions.

The Trump administration's executive order on birthright citizenship was issued in January 2025, shortly after President Trump's second inauguration. The order sparked widespread controversy and legal challenges from various parties. In the lower courts, federal judges consistently ruled against the administration, finding that the order violated the Constitution.

The Supreme Court's June 30 ruling was a significant setback for the Trump administration, which had sought to limit birthright citizenship through executive action. However, the court's decision did not address the underlying constitutional issues at play in the case.

In related news, the Supreme Court's June 27 ruling on universal injunctions has significant implications for federal courts and their ability to issue nationwide orders. The decision has been seen as a major victory for the Trump administration, which had argued that such injunctions were unconstitutional.

The Trump administration's failure to seek rehearing in the birthright citizenship case suggests that its efforts to limit birthright citizenship may be at an end. This development has significant implications for immigration-related policy changes, as it appears that the Supreme Court's ruling will stand.

Lawyers and policymakers should take note of this development, as it signals a shift in the administration's approach to immigration law. The Supreme Court's decision on universal injunctions also has important implications for federal courts and their ability to issue nationwide orders.

As the country continues to grapple with complex issues surrounding immigration and citizenship, this case serves as an important reminder of the role of the judiciary in shaping policy and upholding constitutional rights.

Lawyers should watch for the implications of this development on future immigration-related policy changes, as it suggests that the Trump administration's efforts to limit birthright citizenship may be at an end.

Source: Original reporting via [Source]