OpenAI did not violate copyright laws by using ANI news to train ChatGPT: Delhi High Court declines interim relief

The Delhi High Court has declined to grant interim relief to Asian News International (ANI) in a copyright infringement case against OpenAI, ruling that storing news material published by ANI to train ChatGPT does not amount to copyright infringement under the fair dealing provision of Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act. The court also found that outputs generated by ChatGPT using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technique do not infringe on ANI's copyrights, as the answers generated were not substantially similar to the original content published by ANI.

The Delhi High Court has declined to grant interim relief to Asian News International (ANI) in a copyright infringement case against OpenAI. On Friday, Justice Amit Bansal ruled that OpenAI's storage of news material published by ANI to train ChatGPT does not amount to copyright infringement and hence, declined to grant any interim relief to ANI. This decision has significant implications for the use of copyrighted materials in artificial intelligence training data.

The case revolves around Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, which provides for fair dealing provisions. The court's ruling suggests that storing news material published by ANI to train ChatGPT may be considered fair dealing under this provision. However, the court also noted that the outputs generated by ChatGPT using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technique do not infringe on ANI's copyrights.

The Delhi High Court's decision has significant implications for the use of copyrighted materials in artificial intelligence training data. The ruling suggests that fair dealing provisions may be applied to AI training data, but it also highlights the need for more clarity on this issue. The court's finding that outputs generated by ChatGPT do not infringe on ANI's copyrights is also noteworthy, as it suggests that AI-generated content may not be considered copyright infringement if it does not substantially resemble the original content.

The Delhi High Court's decision has significant implications for the use of copyrighted materials in artificial intelligence training data. Practitioners should take note of this ruling and its potential impact on future cases involving AI training data and copyright infringement. The court's finding that fair dealing provisions may be applied to AI training data highlights the need for more clarity on this issue.